apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com>
Subject Re: 1.0.0.rc2 tarballs now ready...
Date Thu, 01 Jul 2004 16:40:45 GMT
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 09:28:31AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:34:49PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 08:24:18AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > I'm getting a segfault in testsockets on Solaris 9/Intel.  No time to further
> > > debug.  Is anyone else seeing this?  Best I can tell is that an earlier
> > > test is failing and it's passing a NULL parameter on.
> > 
> > Does "./testall -v testsockets" give any useful information?
> 
> testsockets         : |Line 137: expected <0>, but saw <670008>
> \zsh: 13868 segmentation fault  ./testall -v testsockets

Oh for an apr_assert_success... the AF_UNSPEC lookup for "::1" gave
EAI_NONAME by my calculations which is not unexpected for a build on a
Solaris system without IPv6 configured; not a serious failure.

> I was curious why testall doesn't abort a sub-test after a failure, but oh
> well, I didn't write it...  -- justin

It did, and now it doesn't, and stuff like this happens a lot now.

joe

Mime
View raw message