Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40078 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2004 15:44:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jun 2004 15:44:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 1211 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2004 15:44:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 1054 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2004 15:43:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 1006 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2004 15:43:58 -0000 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Subject: Re: Testrand2 Problems? was 1.0.rc1 tarballs From: Paul Querna To: APR Dev List In-Reply-To: <1087586581.1146.23.camel@localhost> References: <007101c45535$b60ba2a0$7500a8c0@goliath> <1087586025.1148.20.camel@localhost> <1087586581.1146.23.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1087659830.15288.37.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.5.7 Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 08:43:51 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 12:23 -0700, Paul Querna wrote: > Okay, The tests pass on a 5.2.1-RELEASE-p7 kernel, > but not on a 5.2-CURRENT built on June 4. I will upgrade this machine > to the latest -CURRENT, and see if there are still problems. > I upgraded to the latest -CURRENT yesterday. Still fails the test. Looks like a regression in FreeBSD. I guess the best action is to report it upstream? -Paul Querna