Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8783 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2004 09:54:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Jun 2004 09:54:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 18068 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2004 09:55:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 18007 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2004 09:55:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 17976 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2004 09:55:23 -0000 Message-ID: <002b01c452bf$015fc020$7500a8c0@goliath> From: "David Reid" To: "APR Dev List" References: <02a401c4522a$cbbfb860$7500a8c0@goliath> <40CEC572.80408@persistent.co.in> Subject: Re: [REVIEW] issues for 1.0 Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:56:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jetnet.co.uk X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > >- we need to decide if Ryan's proposed fix to the mutex_child_init should > >stay or we stick with existing api. I've not been involved in it heavily, > >BUT can we have some votes as otherwise I'll stick with what we have. > > > +1 for Ryans patch (with Bills suggested changes) > > I think we already have some +1s on his patch (and no -1s :) ) Hmm, yours is the first vote I've seen on this... david