From dev-return-12163-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Jun 30 13:09:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54127 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2004 13:09:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2004 13:09:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 74834 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2004 13:09:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 74739 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2004 13:09:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 74699 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2004 13:09:31 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Message-ID: <033101c45ea3$b3eed330$7500a8c0@goliath> From: "David Reid" To: "APR Dev List" References: <031e01c45e9a$b5be2b10$7500a8c0@goliath> <6.1.0.6.2.20040630073002.02ed0ec0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Subject: Re: 1.0 rc2 Tarballs Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:11:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jetnet.co.uk X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > At 07:06 AM 6/30/2004, David Reid wrote: > > >I haven't done apr-iconv as Will Rowe had some reservations about that > >module. If someone who's more familiar wants to roll a tarball that's > >compatible with rc2 that'd be great. > > Doesn't matter - now that you've tagged apr-util-1.0.0 - we are locked > into using that apr-iconv interface period for apr-iconv-1.0.0. > > All I'd suggested at this juncture is to add some notatation that the > apr_iconv_ functions are private interfaces, e.g. > > @deprecated Private Interface! See the apr-util apr_xlate.h API. Sure. Works for me. > Can we get some +1's on this? +1 from me. > IMHO we can't release this tarball without moving to apr-1-config > as mentioned in the apr pkgconfig thread. This allows us to have > 0.9 and 1.0 installed side by side, e.g. if httpd and svn users are > building both older and newer software. While they cannot be > installed side by side, I'm -1 for release; once addressed I'm +1. I'm assuming that this is a reasonably trivial change that hopefully someone will make while I disappear off to work! david