apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <n...@webthing.com>
Subject Re: documented 1.0 showstoppers
Date Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:18:47 GMT
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Paul Querna wrote:

> Another Place to Look is Bugzilla:
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&product=APR&keywords=PatchAvailable
> I currently see 17 bugs with PatchAvailable for APR. Surely these should
> be considered out before any 1.0 release is made.

Exactly.  Those include serious bugs, and proven patches.

We are now using a forked APR just to deal with bugs 28450 (a
showstopper) and 28453 (enhancement).  I can't speak for other
bugs on that list, but it seems entirely possible others may have
been forced to fork for similar reasons.  Doesn't this negate
much of the point of having a supposedly-standard package
in the first place?

Nick Kew

View raw message