apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: apr-iconv 1.0
Date Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:35:18 GMT
David Reid wrote:

>If the answer to the question "does what we have now work" is "yes" then
>apr-util 1.0 is good to go.
>  
>
+1

The apr-iconv API is unfortunate, and the fact that it doesn't support 
transliteration like GNU libiconv is worse, but most uses of apr-iconv 
will be through the apr-util xlate wrapper, so it's not so important to 
clean up the API.

Also, if we're going to change the API, we might as well move base it on 
the iconv-2.0 version (we're currently using the 1.0 as a baseline).

-- Brane


Mime
View raw message