apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <da...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: [REVIEW] issues for 1.0
Date Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:18:56 GMT
> --On Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:59 AM +0100 David Reid <david@jetnet.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> > If we're happy that the API we have is fine, then we don't need a
change.
> > There seems to be a feeling it's not.
> >
> > Your strawman patch and Ryan's seem to be the 2 solutions proposed. We
need
> > to move this forward.
>
> I think we need more input from others who know about our locking scheme
if it
> is to make it into 1.0 (i.e. in two or three days).  I really believe a
major
> change like this so late in the game needs 3 +1s...

Oh, don't get me wrong or misunderstand - without 3 +1's none of this stuff
is gonna make it into 1.0 :-)

> > Again we need to decide if we're gonna do this as it'll be a change to
the
> > API.
>
> I think it's good, but we just need someone to come up with a patch.

OK.

> > Just seems a little pointless to return a status for functions that
don't
> > have a success/fail.
>
> I think it's good, but we just need someone to come up with a patch.

OK. I'll have a look later on :-)

david


Mime
View raw message