Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87920 invoked from network); 24 May 2004 00:31:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 May 2004 00:31:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 40404 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2004 00:12:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 40305 invoked by uid 500); 24 May 2004 00:12:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 39796 invoked by uid 98); 24 May 2004 00:12:35 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: jwoolley@virginia.edu via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(128.143.137.19):. Processed in 0.219288 secs) Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:12:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: jcw5q@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU To: Noah Misch cc: Stas Bekman , APR Development Subject: Re: segfault in apr_bucket_delete In-Reply-To: <20040523184645.GA726@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu> Message-ID: References: <40AC7D57.8000408@stason.org> <20040520110708.GA10291@manyfish.co.uk> <40AD0327.8080200@stason.org> <40AD2706.7080102@stason.org> <40AD3742.10901@stason.org> <20040521100836.GA20247@manyfish.co.uk> <40AE44A5.7070605@stason.org> <40AECC49.3060203@stason.org> <20040523184645.GA726@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, 23 May 2004, Noah Misch wrote: > Perhaps a ``configure'' option for bucket debugging is in order? For that > matter, why not make it the default; most folks who build their own APU do so > for a development project, so intuitive failure modes will trump efficiency in > early use. I can roll a patch, if appropriate. I feel like I went to implement that at some point and ran into trouble... but at this point I don't remember what that would have been. Maybe something to do with certain flags being shared between apr and apr-util. Anyway if you want to do it, feel free. :) --Cliff