From dev-return-11718-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri May 21 18:53:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82269 invoked from network); 21 May 2004 18:53:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 May 2004 18:53:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 6288 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2004 18:54:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 6133 invoked by uid 500); 21 May 2004 18:54:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 6119 invoked by uid 98); 21 May 2004 18:54:06 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: eholyat@OLF.COM via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(216.44.211.80):. Processed in 0.187761 secs) Message-ID: <92322E4B3209D511A19100508B55847802EC0DD7@exchange.olf.com> From: Ed Holyat To: "'Jeff Trawick'" , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: RE: Solaris 2.8 and apr_global_mutex... head of branch Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:55:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sorry about the misunderstanding on my part. =20 It is only the apr_global_mutex_trylock that is not implemented on the Unixes. =20 Which happens to be what I was trying to use. =20 Any updates on where this part of the API stands, It is available on = the win32 side. =20 #0 proc_mutex_no_tryacquire (new_mutex=3D0x3d678) at locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:29 #1 0xff2c17b8 in apr_proc_mutex_trylock (mutex=3D0x3d678) at locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:827 #2 0xff2c0a8c in apr_global_mutex_trylock (mutex=3D0x3d668) at locks/unix/global_mutex.c:130 -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:trawick@attglobal.net] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 6:16 PM To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Solaris 2.8 and apr_global_mutex... head of branch Ed Holyat wrote: > Is the apr_global_mutex.. api available for Solaris and Linux? sure; APR won't build without selecting and calling some native system=20 primitive for that > For me, the apr status is returning that apr_global_mutex_.. is not > implemented on solaris2.8, redhat 2 and 3 enterprise. What is the call to apr_global_mutex_...? what does strace or truss of the program calling it show? for Linux, is your setting (or un-setting) of LD_ASSUME_KERNEL = environment=20 variable the same for apr configure time as at application run time? I am assuming that > it should be, in which case, the problem is in buildconf or libtool version > 1.5.6. I don't see how libtool would affect that, but if you are suspicious it = is easy=20 to try 1.4.3, which most(?) apr users use. =A9 2004 OpenLink Financial=20 Copyright in this message and any attachments remains with us. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If this message is not=20 intended for you it must not be read, copied or used by you or=20 disclosed to anyone else. Please advise the sender immediately if=20 you have received this message in error. Although this message and any attachments are believed to be free of=20 any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into=20 which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the=20 recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility=20 is accepted by Open Link Financial, Inc. for any loss or damage in any=20 way arising from its use.