Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99836 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2004 19:27:03 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2004 19:27:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 61687 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2004 19:26:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 61628 invoked by uid 500); 18 Apr 2004 19:26:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 61584 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2004 19:26:51 -0000 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:26:56 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/test testhash.c Message-Id: <20040418212656.00d0caf5@parker> In-Reply-To: <1082318046.4082dcdebddf9@webmail.mydomain.com> References: <1082318046.4082dcdebddf9@webmail.mydomain.com> Organization: TIMTOWTDI X-Mailer: Yes! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N * rbb@rkbloom.net wrote: > I've never seen function pointer types defined that way. Heh, httpd does it all the time ;-) > The biggest > problem is that this type can't be used without a * in front of the > variable. Not a big deal, but it does make the type less usefull. that's right. but makes it very explicit and protects you from nasty typos. > Also, > the current definition is how all of the existing function pointers are > defined in both APR and APR-util. > Feel free to change it if you want though. Would probably be a compat problem (besides the fact that I don't have apr karma). So let's just leave it as is. nd -- Winnetous Erbe: