apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: setuid, setgid and sticky bits
Date Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:23:00 GMT
* André Malo <nd@perlig.de> wrote:

> * "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> 
> > At 01:36 PM 4/16/2004, André Malo wrote:
> > >* André Malo <nd@perlig.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Aloa,
> > >> 
> > >> APR should support those POSIX bits on systems where it makes sense.
> > >> Attached is a patch for file_io/unix, which seems to used for netware
> > >and> OS/2 as well (but seems to be ok in the first glance).
> > >> 
> > >> What do you think about it? If it's cool, I'd like to get it backported
> > >to> 0.9 as well so we can use it (also in httpd ;)
> > 
> > I don't see that this would pose any harm to win32.
> > 
> > However how should apr react when asked to create a file or modify the
> > perms in such a way that the current platform doesn't expect?
> 
> I'd say, it should just ignore them in that case.

Just wanted to ping again.

-- 
my @japh = (sub{q~Just~},sub{q~Another~},sub{q~Perl~},sub{q~Hacker~});
my $japh = q[sub japh { }]; print join       #########################
 [ $japh =~ /{(.)}/] -> [0] => map $_ -> ()  #            André Malo #
=> @japh;                                    # http://pub.perlig.de/ #

Mime
View raw message