apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" <mad...@hp.com>
Subject RE: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/netware signals.c
Date Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:33:50 GMT
very well then (I'll change APR_SUCCESS to APR_ENOTIMPL) - is it the same for win32 also ?

-Madhu

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brad Nicholes [mailto:BNICHOLES@novell.com]
>Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 3:47 AM
>To: dev@apr.apache.org; joe@manyfish.co.uk
>Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/netware signals.c
>
>
>In fact it is very likely that they won't be implmented on 
>NetWare since
>we don't have robust signal handling support.
>
>Brad
>
>Brad Nicholes
>Senior Software Engineer
>Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
>http://www.novell.com 
>
>>>> Joe Orton <joe@manyfish.co.uk> Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:28:58 AM
>>>>
>On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:45:38PM -0000, madhum@apache.org wrote:
>...
>>   +APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_signal_block(int signum)
>>   +{
>>   +    return APR_SUCCESS;
>>   +}
>
>APR_ENOTIMPL is more approriate for stub functions which aren't
>implemented on the given platform.
>
>joe
>

Mime
View raw message