Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31861 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2004 21:58:46 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Mar 2004 21:58:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 29095 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2004 21:58:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28997 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2004 21:58:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28919 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2004 21:58:30 -0000 Message-ID: <1079215118.4053840e5eef1@webmail.mydomain.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:58:38 -0800 From: rbb@rkbloom.net To: dev@apr.apache.org, rbb@apache.org Cc: apr-site-cvs@apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 X-Originating-IP: 24.211.145.52 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rbb@rkbloom.net Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr-site/docs/coverage apr_atomic.c.gcov apr_cpystrn.c.gcov apr_pools.c.gcov apr_random.c.gcov apr_strings.c.gcov index.html open.c.gcov otherchild.c.gcov proc.c.gcov proc_mutex.c.gcov readwrite.c.gcov sha2.c.gcov sha2_glue.c.gcov shm.c.gcov signals.c.gcov start.c.gcov thread_cond.c.gcov thread_mutex.c.gcov thread_rwlock.c.gcov time.c.gcov userinfo.c.gcov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on calcium.dnsix.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME, RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Report: * 0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name * 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address * [24.211.145.52 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS * [24.211.145.52 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Thu Oct 23 13:26:47 PDT 2003) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes X-uvscan-result: clean (1B2H7q-000235-VB) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Quoting rbb@apache.org: > rbb 2004/03/13 13:50:28 > > Modified: docs/coverage apr_atomic.c.gcov apr_cpystrn.c.gcov > apr_pools.c.gcov apr_random.c.gcov > apr_strings.c.gcov index.html open.c.gcov > otherchild.c.gcov proc.c.gcov proc_mutex.c.gcov > readwrite.c.gcov sha2.c.gcov sha2_glue.c.gcov > shm.c.gcov signals.c.gcov start.c.gcov > thread_cond.c.gcov thread_mutex.c.gcov > thread_rwlock.c.gcov time.c.gcov userinfo.c.gcov > Log: > Update coverage data from porting testshm to unified test suite. I'm sure most of you have noticed by now that the test suite is where I am currently focusing my time. If you watch the test coverage page on the APR web site, you will notice that the files are steadily getting covered better. You can see this because we keep getting more files that are yellow or green instead of red. The colors are decided by just dividing 100 by 3, so red is 0 - 32%, yellow is 33 - 65%, and green is 66 - 100%. Currently, the coverage is getting better because I am porting tests to the unified test suite. Once all existing tests are in the test suite, I will make a few changes. 1) The boundaries between colors will change as we get better coverage. Initially the step will be that 0 - 39% will be red, 40 - 79% will be yellow, and 80 - 100% will be green. My goal is to get between 90 and 100% coverage on all files. To do that I will be making it harder and harder to get "green" coverage. 2) Also, I will be writing new tests. I would welcome help either porting existing tests or writing new ones. The apr/test/README file details how to do this work. Ryan