apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: mod_log_forensic?
Date Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:59:16 GMT
* Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net> wrote:

> André Malo wrote:
> > * Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>somehow I doubt there will be any problems at all getting it approved, but
> >>nobody acted as a champion thus far and asked for approval themselves
> > 
> > 
> > In fact, I've thought it was by intention, because of the APR 1.0 atomic
> > calls ;-)
> 
> shouldn't be any serious problems to work with APR 0.9...
> 
> s/apr_atomic_inc32/apr_atomic_inc/
> s/apr_uint32_t next_id/apr_atomic_t next_id/
> 
> YMMVslightly

Yes, slightly ;-)
apr_atomic_inc32 and apr_atomic_inc are not compatible,
most notable the interface of the latter is not thread safe.

Additionally there's no Win32 section in apr/atomic in 0.9.
-> there needs to be done some apr work before porting mod_log_forensic.

[cc dev@apr]

nd

Mime
View raw message