From dev-return-11164-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Feb 25 02:46:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75481 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 02:46:47 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2004 02:46:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 98835 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2004 02:46:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 98804 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2004 02:46:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 98774 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2004 02:46:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 21:46:32 -0500 (EST) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: jcw5q@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU To: David Reid cc: APR Dev List Subject: Re: gdbm licence issue In-Reply-To: <013f01c3faff$78cc3840$7500a8c0@goliath> Message-ID: References: <200402241435.i1OEZpr01024@devsys.jaguNET.com> <013f01c3faff$78cc3840$7500a8c0@goliath> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, David Reid wrote: > +1 Can we make this a priority for the PMC Chair to persue with the > board? I would, but the board (or rather Greg) is already on it. :) > Given that SVN is now 1.0 we should really get our asses in gear and get 1.0 > out the door. Given the strong opinions that have been shown on list about > this issue this is for sure a showstopper... Agreed on both counts. --Cliff