From dev-return-11124-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon Feb 23 10:32:24 2004
Return-Path: <dev-return-11124-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11972 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2004 10:32:24 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Feb 2004 10:32:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 89462 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2004 10:31:56 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89431 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2004 10:31:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:dev@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89416 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2004 10:31:56 -0000
Message-ID: <4039D681.3060102@attglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 05:31:29 -0500
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031020
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr-util/build apu-hints.m4
References: <20031222224349.57807.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <20040222221557.GA4455@manyfish.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20040222221557.GA4455@manyfish.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:43:49PM -0000, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 
>>  Fix xlate.c compile failure on AIX 5.2.
> 
> ..
> 
>>  --- apu-hints.m4	28 May 2003 04:45:46 -0000	1.3
>>  +++ apu-hints.m4	22 Dec 2003 22:43:49 -0000	1.3.2.1
>>  @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> 
> ...
> 
>>  -    *-ibm-aix*)
>>  +    *-ibm-aix4*|*-ibm-aix5.1*)
>>           APR_SETIFNULL(apu_iconv_inbuf_const, [1])
>>           ;;
> 
> 
> Just noticed: does that intentionally miss out the *-ibm-aix5.0* case?

no such thing

in traditional (i.e., since I was in kindergarten) IBM terms, 5.1 would be 
"release 1 of version 5"

most products use more common meaning where the .1 is more like "revision 1 of 
release X"