From dev-return-11025-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Feb 13 08:09:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37026 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 08:09:17 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2004 08:09:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10085 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2004 08:08:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 10055 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2004 08:08:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 10035 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2004 08:08:52 -0000 Message-ID: <402C8530.2040906@pisa.iol.it> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:05:04 +0100 From: Marco Spinetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Norris CC: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Deficiencies in the poll and/or socket APIs References: <20040213030518.GA1409@gideon.its.monash.edu.au> <20040213030723.GB1409@gideon.its.monash.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <20040213030723.GB1409@gideon.its.monash.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Very interesting question. I'd like to know the answer too. +1. --Marco Robert Norris wrote: >>Getting a POLLHUP event from the poll call also seems to work in some >>places, but its not really portable[1], and APR does it differently >>again. >> >> > >Bah, forgot the reference. Sorry. > >[1] http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2001/06/poll.html > > >