apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: gdbm licence issue
Date Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:56:04 GMT
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 
> Perhaps the default build should disable any features which could make the 
> licensing of the generated "product" different than the licensing of the source 
> code, and if the user is happy otherwise then they can enable such features?
> 
> What I have done thus far where this has been a potential issue is to add
> 
> --without-gdbm --without-berkeley-db
> 
> to the configure invocation.
> 

+1... Including in "sensitive" libs should be a specifically
requested user action.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message