Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17114 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 01:26:06 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 01:26:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 82328 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2003 01:25:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 82295 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2003 01:25:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 82282 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 01:25:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:25:54 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Malo?= , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] for Bug #24664 Message-ID: <35720000.1068686754@scotch.ics.uci.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031113011744.340b87fa.nd@perlig.de> References: <20031113011744.340b87fa.nd@perlig.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0b9 (SunOS/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID autolearn=no version=2.70-cvs X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.70-cvs (1.217-2003-10-04-exp) on scotch.ics.uci.edu X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --On Thursday, November 13, 2003 01:17:44 +0100 Andr=E9 Malo = wrote: > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D24664 > > It seems, that on these GNU systems there's just a /lib/libcrypto.so.1. > The attached patch looks just for this file if -lcrypt doesn't work. > Looks a bit ugly, though it works fine in my tests. Why isn't the linker picking up on it? The second argument to=20 AC_SEARCH_LIBS tells what -l combinations to try (first crypt, then ufc).=20 So, autoconf should be trying -lcrypt if it doesn't find crypt() with the=20 current combination of libraries. So, what exactly is the failure mode here? -- justin