From dev-return-10592-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Sat Nov 08 12:16:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22615 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2003 12:16:49 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Nov 2003 12:16:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 37502 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2003 12:16:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 37280 invoked by uid 500); 8 Nov 2003 12:16:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 37266 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2003 12:16:46 -0000 Message-ID: <3FACDEAF.5030205@attglobal.net> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 07:16:47 -0500 From: Jeff Trawick Reply-To: trawick@attglobal.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] apr function to see if an arbitrary process is alive References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brad Nicholes wrote: > At this point an API like apr_proc_check() would not be portable to > NetWare. Since we own the OS, I'm sure that there is something that we > can do, but it will be a kernel enhancement for us. maybe no code would need it on NetWare anyway... I guess we can see who gets upset with APR_ENOTIMPL ;)