apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>
Subject Re: nested mutexes in 1.0 (was Re: cvs commit: apr/locks/unix thread_mutex.c)
Date Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:26:41 GMT
At 03:29 PM 11/17/2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>-1 veto not vote.  If we cannot support it, we cannot use it internally.

I want to make sure folks understand what my objection is;

if we drop NESTED v.s. UNNESTED I'm fine with that.  

Moving the choice to a private header so we can use it,
but we don't expose it, is altogether bogus, IMHO.


View raw message