apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: [PATCH] for Bug #24664
Date Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:51:33 GMT
* Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote:

> > However the problem ist the number designation. If there's a link
> > libcrypt.so-> libcrypt.so.1 it works without the hack.
> If there is no such link, then you can't link anything against that
> library, end of story.  I presume you only reproduced this by removing
> the symlink?

Yep, but there's no symlink in /lib but only in /usr/lib. So the user's
system is actually broken? Then we shouldn't jump in, sure.

> The libfoo.so.N filenames are only used directly by the run-time linker,
> they correspond to the soname which is extracted from reading
> "libfoo.so" at compile-time.

Thanks, nd

View raw message