From dev-return-10073-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon Jul 07 22:45:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 46280 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2003 22:45:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 46269 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2003 22:45:29 -0000 Sender: sussman@collab.net To: Branko =?utf-8?b?xIxpYmVq?= Cc: Cliff Woolley , dev Subject: Re: setting timestamps References: <3F03D0C9.8000600@xbc.nu> From: Ben Collins-Sussman Date: 07 Jul 2003 17:44:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3F03D0C9.8000600@xbc.nu> Message-ID: Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Branko =C4=8Cibej writes: > This interface looks sane, and I can cobble up a Windows implementation > in two eyeblinks. As for the patch itself: utimes() is a BSDism and may > not be available on all systems. The Unix implementation needs to check > for this, and use utime() instead if utimes() isn't available. Branko, I just committed your & Matt's patches for apr_file_mtime_set(). Your test passes for me. Can you give me a clue about how to "check for utimes()" on unix platforms?