Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28952 invoked by uid 500); 16 May 2003 14:19:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28931 invoked from network); 16 May 2003 14:19:54 -0000 Message-ID: <3EC4F37F.9090709@wstoddard.com> Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 10:19:43 -0400 From: Bill Stoddard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Laurie CC: APR Dev List Subject: Re: PRNG References: <3EC4EE23.6050409@algroup.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <3EC4EE23.6050409@algroup.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ben Laurie wrote: >It has been suggested that I should make my new PRNG (as yet unwritten) >a part of APR, since the original motivation was to fix the UUID >problems in APR. > >I'm more than happy to do that, it seems like the best way to get the >cross-platform support it needs, and it does mean there's one less >dependency for APR. > >So, what do others think about this? > >Cheers, > >Ben. > Sounds like a good addition to APR. +1 Bill