From dev-return-9811-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Sun May 18 16:38:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 91741 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2003 16:38:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 91516 invoked from network); 18 May 2003 16:38:17 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200305181638.h4IGcG223623@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: PRNG To: ben@algroup.co.uk (Ben Laurie) Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 12:38:12 -0400 (EDT) Cc: dev@apr.apache.org (APR Dev List) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "Ben Laurie" at May 16, 2003 02:56:51 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Ben Laurie wrote: > > It has been suggested that I should make my new PRNG (as yet unwritten) > a part of APR, since the original motivation was to fix the UUID > problems in APR. > > I'm more than happy to do that, it seems like the best way to get the > cross-platform support it needs, and it does mean there's one less > dependency for APR. > > So, what do others think about this? > ++1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson