apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jacob Craig Lewallen <jlewa...@cs.ucr.edu>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Socket timeouts and APR_SO_NONBLOCK?
Date Fri, 30 May 2003 22:17:51 GMT
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> 
> Looking at things again, perhaps before injesting enough caffeine, it 
> looks like there are other bogosities w.r.t. timeouts that perhaps hid 
> the bug from me for my particular testcase.  I see various places where 
> we think that sock->timeout != 0 means there is a timeout in place, when 
> a check via apr_is_option_set(sock->netmask, APR_SO_TIMEOUT) is the 
> proper thing to do.

	Ok, I see.. yeah the only code I really focused on was that one function.

> 
> I now see that your patch needs to be committed, but for the short term 
>  I'd like to explore some other bogosities.
> 
> Thanks for hanging in there!
> 

	Ok, I've recompiled and tested with the new changes and things seem to 
be working fine (for the past couple hours). I'll drop a line if 
anything surfaces later. Hey, and thanks for the timely resolution.

--
jacob lewallen
jlewalle@cs.ucr.edu


Mime
View raw message