apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Stoddard <b...@wstoddard.com>
Subject Re: call for vote Re: [PATCH] Re: Frankentables
Date Wed, 21 May 2003 13:46:58 GMT
Brian Pane wrote:

>Thanks.  IMHO, a 4x increase in CPU usage for the worst
>case isn't a problem, as that's a 4x increase in an operation
>that's only a few percent of the total cycles anyway.
>But since the 4x degradation in the worst case may be
>controversial, I'd like to have a vote first.  I'm +1 for
>making this change in APR. Can a few other committers weigh in?

At about how many headers is the performance benefits of this patch lost?


View raw message