apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] multicast support, take 2
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:28:40 GMT
--On Tuesday, April 15, 2003 9:25 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney 
<rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:

> again, this is almost completely untested, unix only, and i'm mainly looking
> for comments on the interface (both the extended socket options interface
> and the APR_SO_MC_REUSEADDR idea).

Looks good on cursory review.

As a nitpick, why not APR_SO_EXT_GROUP_JOIN and apr_socket_join_arg_t instead? 
Realizing, of course, APR_SO_MC_REUSEADDR needs the MC to avoid the collision 
(and has the implicit REUSEPORT if available), but do we really have to 
propagate that MC_ elsewhere?  I'm ambivalent on it, but the mc_'s sort of 
strike me funny.  Not a big deal either way...  -- justin

Mime
View raw message