apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Orton <...@manyfish.co.uk>
Subject Re: HEAD and releases
Date Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:11:51 GMT
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 09:31:04PM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
> A few developers keep suggesting "we need to break things"
> Nobody has ever provided a compelling example since the polls API change.
> And stubbing old functions certainly shouldn't be "getting in the way" of
> further progress twords a stable 1.0, should it?  Or better asked, is it?
> Would you provide an example of a change that must occur?

I tried to fix apr_generate_random_bytes() to use size_t already.  I'd
also like to reorder struct apr_sockaddr_t to make it binary compatible
across !APR_HAVE_IPV6 and APR_HAVE_IPV6, which requires breaking binary
compatibility with 0.9.2.


View raw message