Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 63534 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2003 16:05:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 63518 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2003 16:05:27 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 67.87.19.193 Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:05:28 -0500 Subject: Re: Finally (whew...) WAR_0_9_2_RC1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: dev@apr.apache.org To: Aaron Bannert From: Garrett Rooney In-Reply-To: <166F64CD-50C0-11D7-A563-000393B3C494@clove.org> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 12:51 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> Just cut the darned release. If you have time to make a release, then >> just >> do it. *ANYTHING* that gets released will be better than 0.9.1; we're >> a long >> ways past that release. >> >> So what if it isn't perfect? That's what another release is for. >> >> If we got in the habit of releases every other week, then questions >> like >> this wouldn't even need to be asked. Cut and release, and bugs are >> fixed in >> the next one. >> >> Releases don't need to take a lot of effort. Tag, roll, release. Most >> of >> that is scripted, even. It's just a matter of somebody sitting down >> for an >> hour and doing it. > > I couldn't agree with you more. Huge +1!! agreed, just release the damn thing already. continually waiting for "one more bug fix" won't get us anywhere, there will always be another bug! -garrett