apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brad Nicholes" <BNICHO...@novell.com>
Subject Re: Problem with other_child changes...
Date Mon, 03 Mar 2003 19:15:41 GMT
Further thought.  Isn't the point of APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD so that the
other_child functions can be safely removed from the platform
implementation rather than having to define stub functions that only
return APR_ENOTIMPL?



Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com 

>>> "Brad Nicholes" <BNICHOLES@novell.com> Monday, March 03, 2003
11:45:43 AM >>>
The #if APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD was removed from around the declaration of
the apr_proc_other_child_xxx() procedures in apr_thread_proc.h.  Yet
the
function apr_proc_other_child_refresh() uses the structure
apr_other_child_rec_t which has been #if'ed out using
APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD.  This causes a compiler error on platforms that
do
not implement OTHER_CHILD.  We need to either put the #if back around
the function declarations or define apr_other_child_rec_t for all
platforms that don't implement OTHER_CHILD.

 

Brad Nicholes
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com 

Mime
View raw message