apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Problem with other_child changes...
Date Mon, 03 Mar 2003 20:05:30 GMT
At 12:45 PM 3/3/2003, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>The #if APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD was removed from around the declaration of
>the apr_proc_other_child_xxx() procedures in apr_thread_proc.h.  Yet the
>function apr_proc_other_child_refresh() uses the structure
>apr_other_child_rec_t which has been #if'ed out using
>APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD.  This causes a compiler error on platforms that do
>not implement OTHER_CHILD.  We need to either put the #if back around
>the function declarations or define apr_other_child_rec_t for all
>platforms that don't implement OTHER_CHILD.

No, we should expose apr_other_child_rec_t always, at least its typedef,
see my other post.

I'll make it so.

Bill



Mime
View raw message