Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99527 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2003 13:08:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 99442 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2003 13:08:19 -0000 Message-ID: From: Erwin De Wolff To: "'dev@apr.apache.org'" Subject: question about imploding/exploding time Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:05:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20010714 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Using platform windows XP, APR library version 0.9.2. I wonder if it is correct to get the result: apr_time_exp_tz(&test, 0, 0); the month 0, (zero? not 01 ?!?) year 70 (I understand that) day 1 etc. It seems that it is the number of microseconds since 01-00-1970 00:00:00 GMT (month 00). Is that on purpose done or a bug? On the other hand 01-01-1970 00:00:00 GMT and implode it gives 2678400000000 which is 31 one days in microseconds. So it is consistent at least. If it is meant like this I can easily correct it, but I don't see a reason for this. Greetings Erwin de Wolff