From dev-return-9111-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Tue Feb 04 14:02:32 2003
Return-Path: <dev-return-9111-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85550 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2003 14:02:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:dev@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 85535 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 14:02:32 -0000
From: "Sander Striker" <striker@apache.org>
To: <dev@apr.apache.org>
Subject: RE: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk from ../apr
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:02:32 +0100
Message-ID: <JLEGKKNELMHCJPNMOKHOMEBBIGAA.striker@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <20030204135912.GD23559@samizdat>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> From: Thom May [mailto:thom@planetarytramp.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:59 PM

> * Jeff Trawick (trawick@attglobal.net) wrote :
>> Does anybody see a reason why copying rules.mk at the end of configure 
>> instead of in buildconf would be a problem?

> I can't think of one; we already have to know where apr is so copying
> shouldn't be an issue. patch attached (reverts the prior commit, copies
> rules.mk)

+1.

Sander