apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: How to get the PID?
Date Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:11:59 GMT
Branko Čibej wrote:

>Hmm, looking at our apr_proc_t, I see we _also_ use plain pid_t in there
>(and define it in apr.h on platforms that don't have it). This explains
>why we don't have an apr_os_proc_get -- users will simple use the pid
>member from apr_proc_t. But we don't have one of those
>
Eeek. By "one of those" I meant an apr_os_proc_t, of course, not a
pid_t. What I meant to say was: that without and apr_os_proc_t member,
apr_proc_t is funcamentally broken. There, that's clearer, I hope.

> in apr_proc_t at
>all, which seems just a bit strange to me, and upon reflection I think
>that apr_proc_t is fundamentally broken because of that. It might be a
>bit hard to unbreak it while still maintaining backward compatibility,
>though...
>
>  
>


-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/


Mime
View raw message