apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: How to get the PID?
Date Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:46:23 GMT
Cliff Woolley wrote:

>On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, [UTF-8] Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>  
>
>>It's fairly portable on most every Unix variant. It just so happens that
>>APR isn't about portability across Unixes, so we really should have
>>wrappers. We have apr_os_thread_current, so we should also have an
>>apr_os_proc_current.
>>    
>>
>
>Of course we all realize that not all operating systems *have* processes
>(cough Netware cough :).  Not that that has to be a problem...
>apr_os_proc_current() could just return a constant in that case.  Just
>bringing it up.  +1 on concept.
>  
>
Well, Netware does define apr_os_proc_t, so presumably it has other
magic to make it work.

What worries me is that we don't seem to have an apr_os_proc_get,
either. Is that just another ommossion, or was it deliberate?

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/


Mime
View raw message