apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr/include/arch/unix apr_arch_file_io.h
Date Thu, 13 Feb 2003 23:34:00 GMT
Cliff Woolley wrote:

>On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, [UTF-8] Branko Čibej wrote:
>>Excuse me? your compiler is broken. A function definition is a
>>prototype, so you don't need an extra prototype in this case. But I
>>agree that the prototypse should live in a better place.
>gcc -Wstrict-prototypes causes this.  We look for these on purpose.  :)

Oh, I'm not saying it's good style, only that it's valid C. :-)

I'll move those protos to apr_private.h now.

Brane Čibej   <brane@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/

View raw message