Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 71412 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2003 00:10:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 71389 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 00:10:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:09:54 -0500 (EST) From: Cliff Woolley X-X-Sender: root@deepthought.cs.virginia.edu To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/include/arch/win32 apr_arch_fileio.h In-Reply-To: <20030107000629.92715.qmail@icarus.apache.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 7 Jan 2003 thommay@apache.org wrote: > Log: > Finish off the rename of include/arch > > #include "apr_thread_proc.h" > -#include "fileio.h" > +#include "apr_arch_fileio.h" While we're at it (yes Thom, I'm just trying to make more work for you here ;), can we standardize the fileio vs file_io (etc) fooness? It always irritated the crap out of me that it was apr_file_io.h but fileio.h and I could never remember which one had the underscore and which one didn't. --Cliff