Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 52168 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2003 22:47:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 52113 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2003 22:47:31 -0000 Message-ID: <3E39AB76.8060307@wstoddard.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:47:18 -0500 From: Bill Stoddard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org, dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Altogether Broken OtherChild logic References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030124110322.03045588@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <5.2.0.9.2.20030124110322.03045588@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <5.2.0.9.2.20030130144909.02c4edf0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030130144909.02c4edf0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > > > > > >>I am guessing that the windows MPM is whacking the piped logger because >>ocr->proc->hproc is somehow hosed. >> >> > >No, that is working fine. It is whacking it because I modified the code in _check() >to do exactly the same thing on Win32 as it does on Unix. > Humm... perhaps you got the cart before the horse... if i recall correctly, I think I created the _check function specificly to handle reliable piped logs on Windows. Someone (perhaps me I don't recall) dropped some code into the Unix branch to do the same thing. My point... I think the unix side was broken and you made a mistake by assuming the unix side was correct and modeling the windoes code after it. Bill