Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 19142 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2003 16:57:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 19104 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 16:57:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:57:09 -0800 From: Justin Erenkrantz Reply-To: Justin Erenkrantz To: dev@apr.apache.org cc: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_auth_ldap vs mod_ldap (was: Re: authz / authn and mod_auth_ldap) Message-ID: <2147483647.1043225829@[10.0.1.4]> In-Reply-To: <20030122173828.W93563-100000@foem.leiden.webweaving.org> References: <20030122173828.W93563-100000@foem.leiden.webweaving.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.0 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.50-cvs X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N --On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:39 PM +0100 Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > One 'ultimate' way to proof how much sense it would make is by > using it to do simply/do some clever apache/tomcat connection > pooling. For that, you should use apr_reslist_t. IIRC, it was written for exactly this purpose. I believe Pier was using it for the now defunct mod_jerry, but I don't think mod_jk picked up on it. I would also bet that the pooling code for LDAP could take advantage of apr_reslist_t and remove a lot of code. -- justin