Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:37 -0800
From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release 0.9.2 of apr/apr-util?
Message-ID: <20030122122137.A26222@lyra.org>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@apr.apache.org
References: <2147483647.1043229176@[10.0.1.4]>
 <2147483647.1043229176@[10.0.1.4]>
 <5.2.0.9.2.20030122124430.0287a148@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
 <3E2EF986.4000408@electricjellyfish.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <3E2EF986.4000408@electricjellyfish.net>;
 from rooneg@electricjellyfish.net on Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:05:26PM -0500

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:05:26PM -0500, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
> >So my personal desire would be to release 2.0.45, with its bugfixes
> >based on APR 0.9.2 (release).  Would anyone object to that symytry?

If "based on APR 0.9.2", you mean: APR(UTIL) releases "soon", and httpd next
week, referring to 0.9.2 as a minimum version, then yes.

If "based on" means snapping APR into httpd, then no.

[ I suspect the former, so all is good with me ]

>...
> >The only other 'little thing' I want to do is bring in Allen Edward's
> >suggestions for debugging symbols for win32 release builds, so
> >those of us bug hunting can track down pesky segfaults and other
> >odd behavior from Win32 core dumps.  It's a trivial patch, I'm just 
> >trying to figure out how we can also get WinNT .dbg symbol files 
> >out of the deal without too much pain.

Let's not hold the release on this. If that misses 0.9.2, then we can always
snap another release.

> in that case, why don't we wait for this change, then roll 0.9.2?  now 
> that the issues with the configure scripts that kept us from building 
> from a released tarball have been resolved, i'd like to see apr making 
> releases more often, so client apps (apache, subversion, etc) can simply 
> use those rather than pulling something out of cvs.

I totally agree. I'd love to release them myself, but haven't been finding
the time :-(

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/