apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr/test testfile.c
Date Thu, 02 Jan 2003 15:56:51 GMT
<rbb@apache.org> writes:

> Guys, this is ridiculus.  If a test fails, the correct approach is not to
> remove the test from the test suite.  The hole point of the test suite is
> to ensure that APR works the same on _ALL_ platforms.  If it doesn't, then
> it is just as hard to write portable programs with APR as without.
> There are two options when a test fails.  1)  Fix the bug in the APR code.
> 2)  Introduce a feature macro that allows programmers to determine if a
> feature exists with #ifdefs.  Removing a test is _not_ an option.  It
> weakens APR's portability.
> Plus, not long after Will added this test, I posted to the list remarking
> that it was a problematic test and looking for possible solutions.  We
> should at least have a conversation over how we want to deal with this.
> -1 for removing this test.

What is the precise technical reason for your veto?

I think it is not a valid property to test in an APR test suite
(outside the scope of APR) and it is harmful to leave it there (not

Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

View raw message