apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>
Subject Re: arch specific include files, the naming thereof
Date Mon, 06 Jan 2003 04:37:06 GMT
Actually, since bugs like this will be isolated to
development on new parts of APR and can't happen
in application code (these are private headers, afterall),
why don't we just namespace protect them as we come
across them, as in the case of dso.h?


On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 07:45  PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Drop the "private" part. They're already private based on where they're
> located, so there isn't a need to further qualify them. I'm also 
> assuming
> that we can manage to avoid conflicts between the arch-specific and the
> public file names (since we manage both namespaces).

View raw message