--On Tuesday, January 28, 2003 11:48 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Just more observations, another pair of eyeballs might come in
> handy.
I can't say I know much about OC logic, and I don't really have time
to investigate this, but...
> -1 on 0.9.2 till this issue is resolved.
I don't really see why we should hold off on 0.9.2 because the
current API is broken. We're not saying it is 1.0.
Or, do you plan on holding httpd 2.0.45 back as well? If you still
plan to have 2.0.45 out soon and your offer to co-RM 0.9.2 at the
same time holds, then waiting is fine with me. Otherwise, we should
look at getting someone else (Garrett?) to RM. =)
And, are you going to be able to fix this in a way that doesn't blow
up backwards compatibility with httpd's 2.0.42+? -- justin
|