apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@lyra.org>
Subject Re: arch specific include files, the naming thereof
Date Mon, 06 Jan 2003 06:00:10 GMT
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 11:59:50PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>...
> My argument against using "apr_*.h" would be twofold.

Fair enough... both points make sense.

>...
> and for shits and giggles, I'll even add:
> 
> +0   on using apr_arch_*.h
> -0   on using apr_os_*.h  [too confusing, since for example apr_os_file_t
>                            would *not* be defined in apr_os_file_io.h]

+0.5 and -0, respectively.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

Mime
View raw message