From dev-return-8788-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Dec 20 00:53:50 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 93698 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2002 00:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 93678 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2002 00:53:48 -0000 Message-ID: <3E026A21.2010600@xbc.nu> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 01:53:53 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: sl, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Reid CC: APR Dev List Subject: Re: [time to move on I guess] APR_TMP_DIRECTORY References: <20021209185950.M25389-100000@foem.leiden.webweaving.org> <3DF6EA06.1050801@xbc.nu> <20021212160515.A5107@lyra.org> <002e01c2a4fa$8d659820$7500a8c0@goliath> <3DFE7B9F.8030000@xbc.nu> <003401c2a741$99e3a120$7500a8c0@goliath> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N David Reid wrote: >Yeah nice thought but it's been vetoed by quite a few folks. You do read the >same list I do don't you? :) > Sorry? I haven't seen a single veto. All I've seen is some (admittedly heated) discussion, and no reply yet from Dirk-Willem (who seems to oppose this addition the most) to my arguments in <3DF6EA06.1050801@xbc.nu> and proposal in <3DFE7B9F.8030000@xbc.nu>. Perhaps I'm blind. No, I'm not going to call for a vote. If anyone wants to call a veto on technical grounds, they should speak up. (BTW, accompanying the implementation of that proposal with a discussion in the docs of safe usage of scratch directories would, in my opinion, be a Good Thing.) -- Brane Čibej http://www.xbc.nu/brane/