apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] apr_dir_read doesn't return requested information
Date Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:12:42 GMT
As much as I agree 0 might be a valid inode... I strongly suspect
that 0 would be reserved for the boot sector or other filesystem
tables.  I'm not too worried that 0 is a valid file of anything other than


At 07:19 PM 12/18/2002, =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>At 11:48 AM 12/18/2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>>At 08:14 AM 12/18/2002, Philip Martin wrote:
>>>>This is for dir.c version 1.71 with the patch reverted.  The
>>>>Subversion code is svn_io_get_dirents in subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c,
>>>>it passes APR_FINFO_TYPE | APR_FINFO_NAME to apr_dir_read.  The first
>>>>two calls to apr_dir_read return "." and ".." and the Subversion code
>>>>skips them, the following gdb information is for the third call
>>,,, never mind my earlier questions.  Committed a patch to ignore the
>>results of d_type when it's DT_UNKNOWN (or a code we don't grok)
>>and ignore the results of d_fileno/d_ino when the value is 0 or -1.
>Yes, I'd figured on something like that being the correct fix. But I'm
>not sure what to use as an invalid inode number; -1 almost certainly,
>but I have a horrible suspicion that 0 might be a valid inode.
>Brane Čibej   <brane@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/

View raw message