apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@attglobal.net>
Subject Re: apr_mmap_t
Date Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:52:02 GMT
<rbb@apache.org> writes:

> BTW, I want to be 100% clear.  We don't use incomplete types for binary
> compatibility.  The only reason that we use incomplete types is for
> portability reasons.  In APR 2.0, I fully expect most of the incomplete
> types to shrink, and for a good portion of APR to use complete types.

I want to be 100% clear too :)  One reason we use incomplete types is
for binary compatibility.  Maybe there was a time when we didn't care
about that, but those days are over.

Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

View raw message