Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 59483 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2002 15:41:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 59468 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2002 15:41:14 -0000 Message-ID: <3DAD8899.8080901@xbc.nu> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 17:41:13 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: sl, en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rbb@apache.org CC: Jeff Trawick , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: add additional parm for protocol to apr_socket_create() before 1.0? References: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N rbb@apache.org wrote: >Fix the existing API before we hit 1.0. > > +1. Otherwise we'll just have a mess of _ex functions. -- Brane Čibej http://www.xbc.nu/brane/