Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 68104 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2002 01:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 68093 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2002 01:24:57 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: cancer.clove.org: jerenk set sender to jerenkrantz@apache.org using -f Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:25:02 -0700 From: Justin Erenkrantz To: Garrett Rooney Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr-util/include apu_version.h Message-ID: <20020912012502.GA1555@apache.org> Mail-Followup-To: Justin Erenkrantz , Garrett Rooney , dev@apr.apache.org References: <20020912004438.81761.qmail@icarus.apache.org> <012222DC-C5ED-11D6-A1A9-00039364885A@electricjellyfish.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <012222DC-C5ED-11D6-A1A9-00039364885A@electricjellyfish.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:14:37PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote: > one question though. when i download the apr-util-0.9.1.tar.gz tarball > and untar it, the configure script errors out. it's trying to find > install-sh or install.sh in ../apr/build, but it can't find it, since > while i do happen to have the apr-0.9.1 tarball untarred in the same > directory, it is in a directory named apr-0.9.1, not apr. Now you know why we needed to go through the mechanics of a release. =) The fix, of course, is to extract stuff to apr and apr-util (no version numbers and in parallel). > adding --with-apr=../apr-0.9.1 does not seem to help. It has to do with autoconf hardcoding the apr path in configure via AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(../apr/build) in configure.in. What we may need to do is to create an apr-build module that allows us to store the config.guess/config.sub/install.sh/mkdir.sh files that we can force all projects to check out locally rather than having their own local (potentially stale) copy. Thoughts? But, somehow APR-util needs its own local copy of these files, but I'd rather see us consolidate them somehow. -- justin